• Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    88 days ago

    This is just tacit support for the present system of plunder and genocide just because you don’t want to be responsible for ending the plunder and genocide.

    • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -58 days ago

      And now we’re into the billion different schools of ethics thing again. No, I didn’t want to be responsible for the innocent people who would die as a result of this hypothetical situation where I have the ability to kick off a bloody revolution. So if there’s a way to stop fascism and techno-slavery without risking the lives of the people I would be trying to save, I would prefer to go with that option.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        58 days ago

        That option doesn’t exist, though, you’re just hiding behind vague notions of “ethics” to justify inaction.

        • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -18 days ago

          What inaction? I’m acting locally, I’m volunteering, I’m raising my kids to be skeptical of anyone who suggests that empathy is weakness. You’re saying this like there’s an actual option that I’m choosing not to take. I’m saying, if I were somehow able to choose the way the change occurs, it wouldn’t be in a spray of bullets. But it’s not like that option is actually available to me.

            • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              No. I’m advocating for us to try for the best possible version of our future. It may be inevitable, but I’m not interested in hoping for a world where we consider the loss of a hundred million people under the final spasming throes of a dying capitalist oligarchy to be an acceptable loss. Yes, it would be ultimately the oligarchs’ fault, but I still couldn’t live with myself if I were the one advocating for it.

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                48 days ago

                Nobody is advocating for that, though. Revolution is very rarely that bloody, you need to look at historical example.

                • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 days ago

                  I was hoping that my ad absurdum example was clear. I just meant “a very large number.”

                  Either way, I certainly hope nobody is seriously advocating for that. It would be quite bleak if that were the only way change could ever occur.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    17 days ago

                    Revolutionaries can’t just “do a revolution,” we prepare for it so we can succeed when it happens. This is how revolution has occured historically, and there isn’t really a way to avoid it with any reasonable chance of success.