Lemmy.world is temporarily disabling open signups and moving to an application-required signup process, due to ongoing issues with malicious bot accounts.

We know this is a major step to take, but we believe that it’s the right one for both us and our community right now.

We’re working on a better long-term technical solution to these bots, but that will take time to create, test, and verify that it doesn’t cause any problems with federation and how our users use our site, and we’d rather make sure we get it right than have a site that’s broken.

We’re making this change on 28 Aug 2023, and don’t have a specific timeline for how long registrations will require an application, but we will post an update once our new anti-abuse measures are in place and working.

Take care, LW Team

  • 520
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Big corps are more sociopathic than you realise. There are so many underhanded games going on at that level it will make your head spin.

    Big businesses indirectly and sometimes directly fund APT groups. They will buy things that give them anonymous access to competitor trade secrets, or fund attack campaigns against competitors. This sounds like the kind of attack campaign a competitor might launch as part of a one-two combo. This is the first part, the second part is to get editorials out there regarding how lemmy.world is full of CSAM.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Which is why you’re signed in on lemmy.world? Because no one cares about Lemmy?

        • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          -32 years ago

          Obviously their comment was hyperbole, and the literal interpretation is based on the context of the conversation. Do a bit of critical thinking.

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Lemmy is nowhere near big enough to cause any of the competitors any consternation.

          Edit: to be more clear, the fediverse as a whole isn’t big enough. It’s like believing XMPP is going to cause Apple to worry about iMessage.

    • @bemenaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      No way would a company risk being caught being responsible for CP. That would cause a massive backlash in the US socially, and the legal troubles would be huge. And the stock market would also very painfully punish them.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Do you really think there aren’t ways for a company to avoid having their names put against such operations? A simple anonymous darknet transaction is enough to get this done without anyone’s name being put on it or CSAM touching corporate machines.

        • @bemenaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Risk outweighs the rewards. Especially for something as small as lemmy. Take off the tin foil hat. It doesn’t work like that. Have companies done evil things, yes, but in this case, absolutely no way.

          • 520
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Risk outweighs the rewards.

            What risk? Keep it off the books, take standard dark web precautions when purchasing such a service and there’s no chance it’ll be traced back to you.

            Especially for something as small as lemmy.

            Small but growing, and steadily establishing itself. That’s a momentum certain companies will want to kill.

            Take off the tin foil hat. It doesn’t work like that.

            ahahahahaha.

            My sweet summer child, I’ve seen it first-hand work EXACTLY like this. I work in the field of offensive security. On the one hand it first amazed me how much big legitimate companies play in that space but then I realised - of fucking course they do. It only takes a bit of know how to sweep most things under the rug.

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Nah. The risk greatly outweighs the reward. Even if this hits the news, I doubt it’d affect numbers on here that much, especially since it’s not that big. It’s not even big enough to cause issues for “competitors” (and I use the term lightly). The fediverse is simply not really ready to compete with established actors. So the “benefit” is quite small. The risk if they’re caught includes executives getting jail time and likely irreversible harm to their brand.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Nah. The risk greatly outweighs the reward.

        Does it? Standard dark web precautions are more than enough to throw any investigation into a dead end, especially for a one-off transaction with the buyer having little to no other activity.

        The fediverse is simply not really ready to compete with established actors.

        Yet. The Fediverse isn’t ready to compete yet. Business people aren’t looking purely at the present, they’ve got a keen eye on the foreseeable future too. If there is a growing momentum towards the fediverse, that can spell trouble for Reddit in 5 years time. The entire point of such an attack is to derail momentum on the platforms. By the time they are ready to compete, it’s much too late for this kind of attack to have any reasonable effect.