For some reason I’ve just never liked Spider-Man. He comes off as a whiney, ignorant child that never seems to grow up or mature despite everything he goes through. I love a good coming of age story, but he just never seems to become an adult.

  • gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Cyclops. What a toolbox.

    And in the X-Men ‘97 reboot, WOW! have they ramped up the toolbox factor.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    A superhero who can’t stand? The Christopher Reeves Superman.

    I’ll see myself out.

  • @xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Batman. He’s a billionaire playboy living in a city full of poverty. He may not kill but he has no problem crippling someone for life. And the fact he apparently learns nothing about the joker over the decades has resulted in so so many people dying to the joker’s schemes.

    And the reality is that he’s still that same child in that alley but in an adult’s body. He takes on different child robins because he never grew past that. He has trauma that was never treated and one of the main symptoms of trauma is being stuck in the time period that the trauma happened. He doesn’t really have a personality beyond the trauma.

      • BruceTwarzen
        link
        fedilink
        1211 months ago

        Ah yes, the good old take from people who never read a comic book

          • Stardust
            link
            fedilink
            1111 months ago

            While arguably Batman could use his wealth better (especially in versions where he’s richer than Luthor, because you don’t get to be richest guy without being a major asshole who does things like force workers to pee in bottles), the other guy/gal also has a point. The comic book universe isn’t our universe, it has aliens invading and Spwecial People who have to be fought by other special people. Batman is basically super-powered the way he can run a marathon, run a chemical analysis and synthesize a new cure for something overnight, and jump 10 feet, they just pretend otherwise.

            You might enjoy Harley Quinn where Batman gets arrested for tax fraud.

            • Zorque
              link
              fedilink
              1311 months ago

              He also does put money into trying to fix the city. Gotham is canonically cursed like five times over. No matter how much cash you mainline into the city it’s not going to get better.

    • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      He spends a lot on “normal” help for the city, but people don’t know this because they don’t read the comics.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    There are tons im not wild about. Can’t stand. I dunno. at this point there have been multiple versions of most and usually at least one interpretation is decent.

  • neoman4426
    link
    fedilink
    3111 months ago

    Jane Foster when she was the wielder of Mjolnir. Not for anything about her personally, but the fact that Thor was treated as a codename. It’s the dude’s actual name, it’d be like if Sam Wilson went around introducing himself as Steve Rogers when he took the Captain America mantle. It’s happened a few other times like with Eric Masterson, but at least he had the excuse that for most of the time he used the name he and the actual Thor were sharing a body.

    • @leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      The thing is that, as you said, it’s happened several times before. Beta Ray Bill, Red Norvell, Eric Masterson… it’s been established for a long time that in the Marvel universe the title of Thor, God of Thunder, may be held by people who aren’t Thor Odinson (and that he might occasionally lose it, though so far only temporarily, at least in the main continuity).

    • @RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      1611 months ago

      I think it’s both, his name and his power. In Thor 1 when Odin sends Mjolnir to earth he whispers to it something like “May he who’s been worthy possess the power of Thor”.

        • @xkforce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Because the point was to show that he’s worthy without completely changing him. Same with vision.

          • @JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            I thought vision was able to lift the hammer because he wasn’t a living being? At least I came to that conclusion because he never possessed the “power of Thor”

            • @xkforce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              Vision is alive. His body is composed of living tissue woven together with the mind stone and vibranium. That whole speel by Stark arguing that vision could only lift the hammer in the same way an elevator would was him rationalizing why his creation was worthy but he wasn’t. The whole point of the scene where vision lifted the hammer for the first time was to show that he could be trusted. Because at that point, almost everyone had their doubts.

      • eightpix
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        Yeah, I don’t mind it. Thor is a name and a title/power. God (presumably) is a name, and Thor has the power of a god.

        Prince is a title. It’s also a name. And, to some musicians, Prince is a god.

        It’d be rare to win an argument by invoking Prince, but there you go.

    • @Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Excuse me, but that’s always been the case. The first ever appearance of Thor is in Journey into Mistery #83, that’s before he had his own comic, in that comic a guy called Don Blake finds a cane, and when he grabs it this happens https://static1.cbrimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/journey-into-mystery-83-thor-debut-1.jpg

      So Thor has always been the title of the person in possession of the Hammer, he converts himself into Thor by grabbing the hammer, the movies then changed that because in the Marvel Ultimate universe it’s different, but Jane Foster is from the original comics, where holding the hammer made you Thor, and she did exactly that in the 70s, just a couple of decades after Don Blake.

    • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Marvel ran a miniseries called “Battleworld.” Yadda yadda, Dr. Doom a single planet composed of all the different Marvel timelines. The police force controlling everything is the Thor Corps, which includes dozens of different iterations of Thor, including a Groot Thor.

  • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    Modern Batman and Modern Superman.

    I won’t go on my 2 hour rant off everything wrong. But a short version is the writing for them is lazy and undeveloped. Both of them represent the most uninteresting form of a power fantasy. The modern Batman of ‘having a plan for everything’ and being this overburden angsty character is just awful. If Batman was a d&d character, he has loaded dice and is throwing that 20s on intimidation. And for Superman he’s just not interesting, because with the amount of power he’s been given and the amount of abilities he has the fact that lex luthor is somehow a villain of his is laughable.

    Batman used to be the world’s greatest detective. And for me the last time I saw Batman be Batman was the '90s animated series. And frankly the most recent movie The Batman also did a very good job I thought in that regard.

    Superman used to have limits. He was fast but not infinite speed fast. He was strong but not infinite strength.

    In both cases it feels like the people who write for these characters use one simple rule… This my favorite character so he win. Neither character feels like their struggles are earned, because the writing is forced. Like it used to be if Superman needed to save somebody you weren’t 100% sure he’d be able to get there in time, stop the bad guy save the people! Modern Superman is like, a being a hundred light years away, tripped and their falling! They need your help before they get a boo-boo and I have no doubt Superman would get there somehow and then save a hundred worlds along the way. (An over-exaggeration I know but I want to get the point across at how lazy I feel the writing is). Or the fact that anybody fears Batman when most of his villains barely fear him. You have members like Green lantern, Martian manhunter, Superman, and Wonder woman who act like in any way Batman is a threat to them.

    I’ll stop ranting cuz I can honestly go on. But I will say with the massive decline for me personally with these two, I’ve been far more receptive of some of the other DC characters that I used to overlook when I was younger. I can’t believe I 100% slept on the flash like that dude is straight boss. Or plastic man! So at least some good came of it.

  • @TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    4311 months ago

    Superman. He just does everything and wins. Unless you show him a green rock.

    It’s stupid. I don’t understand how it ever interested anyone.

    • RachelRodent
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      it’s his ideals make him interesting, his nemesis litterally is an evil billonaire

    • Stardust
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      I love the version of Superman where he growing up and is friends with Luthor and he’s like ‘I cannot tell him my secret because my dad would disapprove’ and it’s got accidental closeted queer vibes.
      And there’s this comic book (not in the same continuity) where Luthor is this mad genius who escapes from prison easily and Clark interviews him and he’s like “I like you Clark, you’re so humble and down to Earth, but I hate Superman who is the opposite of that.”
      and then Lois likes Superman more than Clark, at least to start with, in some versions I think.
      And then with Brainiac there’s the possible storyline of ‘this computer has a lot of information stored on my lost culture but he is also an existential risk to all sapients everywhere in the galaxy ahhhhggg’.
      And how will Clark deal with an environment where everyone is hostile to immigrants when he is one himself and also dedicated to upholding the law?
      And the first comic where he interacts with Batman is actually fairly good: Batman threatens to bomb people if Superman unmasks him and Superman is like ‘oh shit, he is not lying, I can hear his heartbeat’, but Batman was actually threatening to explode himself. And the cartoon where Batman is fighting Brainiac and his costume gets ripped to reveal he was Superman all along was hilarious: “I did not predict this possibility.” The Justice League series in general (part of the same continuity) was pretty good actually.

      I like the potential stories there. There’s so many emotional possibilities. Stories where he just punches stuff are indeed boring. He is, frankly, under-utilized as a character imo because many writers don’t understand that, or think the solution is to make a version of him that is evil which still involves him punching stuff, or because they’re scared to actually touch on political issues like immigration or queerness. (can you imagine how many people would explode if Luthor was an ex-boyfriend for both him and Lois and they bonded over how shitty Luthor was as a date lol.)

    • @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t think that it’s a fantastic recipe for a character. The powers restrict the plots.

      I think that less-potent powers tend to make for better story.

      A lot of fictional series in various formats – not just comic books – make characters or events more-important or more-powerful over the course of the series, to top each previous episode, and I think that the plots tend to become increasingly constrained late in a lot of series.

    • @Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2711 months ago

      First, the appeal of Superman is his heart more than his strength. There’s one comic where he fights a giant robot and stops a runaway train, but the scene everyone remembers is when he talked someone down from the edge of a building.

      Second, Superman may be invincible, but Lois Lane isn’t. It’s easy to defeat a villain, but much harder to defeat them while also keeping Lois safe. And she actively invites danger, so it’s always tricky keeping her safe.

      Third, not every problem can be punched. Luthor’s greatest weapon against Superman isn’t kryptonite; it’s Public Relations. You can punch a monster, but that won’t help you stop a smear campaign.

    • He’s OK if you stick to classic Superman. He wasn’t a god, back then. Couldn’t turn back time, out-speed The Flash, or fly into the sun and pupate for a hundred years into some ultimate being.

      He became increasingly absurd over the years.

    • @Kalothar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      I’m a big fan of Supes myself, but it depends on who’s writing him and what the goal is.

      He is at his best when it’s a problem he can’t punch away, it’s about courage, and honor of defending others. Superman without powers is still the same stand up powerful character, that is crux of what makes him interesting.

    • BruceTwarzen
      link
      fedilink
      -811 months ago

      It’s stupid because you don’t understand it? Aeems like you are the dumb one then.