After returning home from the war in Ukraine, many Russian soldiers end up in court on domestic violence charges. However, even if convicted, they usually receive little more than a slap on the wrist. According to a new report from the independent outlet Verstka, Russian courts routinely give combat veterans the minimum sentence for crimes, often letting them off with small fines — equivalent to as little as $55 — for offenses like assault. Meduza shares an English-language summary of Verstka’s findings.
“My husband returned home from the war. But this isn’t my husband, he’s not the man I knew before. Sometimes it feels like he was killed. His body came back, but not his soul. He’s become irritable. Everything angers him. Me, the kids, and everyone around him.”
“My husband returned home from the war. But this isn’t my husband, he’s not the man I knew before. Sometimes it feels like he was killed. His body came back, but not his soul. He’s become irritable. Everything angers him. Me, the kids, and everyone around him.”
Messages like these periodically appear in social media groups for wives, mothers, and daughters of Russian soldiers fighting in Ukraine.
More than a million men living in Russia have combatant or veteran’s status, including those who fought in Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Syria. In the last two years, those fighting in Ukraine have joined their ranks.
From the early months of the 2022 invasion, human rights activists predicted that returning soldiers would trigger a surge in violence in the country. But whether this has actually happened is harder to determine. On the one hand, misdemeanor cases for minor assaults actually decreased, falling below 170,000 for the first time in seven years. On the other hand, the number of felony cases for battery has risen significantly: from 3,750 in 2019 to 13,241 in 2023.
Analysis of court verdicts and decisions across Russia shows that in the two years following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, domestic violence court cases involving combat veterans increased compared to 2020-2021. Moreover, this is by no means an exhaustive tally: Russian courts don’t publish all records, and many judges omit a defendant’s combat status from official paperwork.
In 2020-2021, magistrates reviewed at least 59 misdemeanor assault cases involving veterans. In 2022-2023, such cases nearly doubled to at least 104. District courts handled at least 33 federal assault cases where the defendants were veterans in 2020-2021, and this number almost doubled to at least 64 in 2022-2023.
Although judges seldom specify the combat zone, Verstka discovered that at least 19 men involved in these cases participated in the invasion of Ukraine. Both before and after the full-scale invasion, the vast majority of victims in these cases were women.
Getting off easy
In February 2024, a Russian magistrate’s court in annexed Crimea fined a veteran of the war in Ukraine for assaulting his wife and stepdaughter. The man told the court that his relationship with his wife deteriorated after he returned from the front and was diagnosed with cancer. According to him, his wife didn’t support him sufficiently during his treatment. He claimed that after he decided to leave, his wife attacked him and he pushed her away. “If I’d beaten her, bruises and scratches wouldn’t be the only injuries,” he told the court.
His wife gave a different account. She testified in court that her husband was habitually abusive and, that night, had threatened her with a knifing. The woman also alleged that her husband said he had “killed people like her and her daughter in Ukraine.” Doctors recorded five abrasions and 15 bruises on the woman’s arms, legs, and back. During sentencing, the judge took into account the man’s status as a combat veteran and his illness, and decided to issue only a fine.
In Tatarstan in November 2022, combat veteran Maxim Karasyov spent an entire night drinking. The next morning, he started throwing things at his wife. When she threatened to call the police, he pinned her down and tried to take her phone. She attempted to flee but was forced to return when she couldn’t open the gate. Karasyov, still drunk, then got into his car and drove off, allowing his wife the chance to call the police.
A district court fined Karasyov 7,000 rubles ($77). The judge explained the leniency of the sentence by referencing the defendant’s character, his two children, and the fact that he had fought in Ukraine.
According to Verstka’s findings, judges cited combat participation as a mitigating factor in 87.5 percent of felony battery cases and 61 percent of misdemeanor cases. The most common punishments handed out to combat veterans found guilty of domestic violence are community service, corrective labor, and probation. In all the cases Verstka analyzed, only one veteran was sentenced to imprisonment. Initially, he was given four months of community service for hitting a woman on the head, but due to an unserved sentence for robbery, he was sent to prison for two years.
For misdemeanor offenses, judges most frequently imposed a fine of 5,000 rubles ($55) — the minimum penalty provided by law. However, this money goes to the state, not the victim. In some cases, the court may not impose any penalty at all if it deems the case insignificant or if the defendant and the victim reconcile. In the cases analyzed by Verstka, judges twice terminated proceedings due to the “insignificance” of the case and three times due to reconciliation between the parties.
A question of cultural values
In a 2013 study, Russian psychologist Anna Ermolaeva found that soldiers returning from conflict zones are more prone to suspicion, impulsivity, anxiety, and extreme self-doubt compared to those without combat experience.
At the same time, not all men returning from war resort to violence against women. Stanislav Khotsky, a psychologist specializing in the treatment of people prone to aggression and violence, believes that a person’s prior values are a key factor in how that individual is shaped by their wartime experiences.
“If before gaining combat experience, their worldview included the possibility of using violence against loved ones, the chances of this increase,” he explains. “Why? Because veterans often experience an increase in their own aggression, which, in turn, raises the risk of them inflicting harm.” He asserts that with proper societal support, the risk of domestic violence in families with combat veterans can be mitigated.
Yulia Arnautova, the head of public relations at the advocacy group Nasiliyu.net (No to violence) concurs. “War is one of the most traumatic experiences a person can go through,” she says. “Traumatized people need comprehensive help — both psychological and psychiatric. They need to be made aware that they have a problem and that society is ready to help them.”
However, those working with returning soldiers emphasize that not all combat veterans suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and warn against conflating PTSD with aggression. “The people I worked with who had PTSD weren’t violent toward their loved ones, as far as I know,” says Ilya Gimpel, a former psychologist at the state-funded Defenders of the Fatherland Foundation.
“It’s important to understand that the main factors creating an environment for domestic violence are societal traditions and certain mindsets that justify violence against women by invoking certain cultural norms,” Gimpel added. “And until we have laws that prohibit the promotion and justification of violence, this will continue.”
Is there any military that actually properly convicts their own soldiers for harm they caused to foreign actors in violation of international law?
When there’s sufficient popular demand.
The article is not about that anyway.
I mean, those are the traditional values they are fighting for - a traditional family made up of only one man and one woman, where one of them (usually the former) is aggressive with the other as a normal way of life.
This is also what the Putler-backed far right parties in Europe stand for.
A horrible simplification. Power is what they are fighting for and they are getting it.
This is also what the Putler-backed far right parties in Europe stand for.
In European politics corrupt, and usually by Russia among others, parties encompass much more than these. You can tell easily a not yet poisoned voice when comparing with theirs.
Power is what they are fighting for and they are getting it.
Indeed, they are fighting for power, that’s what every political force does. But what I was referring to was the way they do it - they put excessive emphasis on “traditional values” in their campaigns (whichever those might be). They picture an idilic image of these and sell to the public, so they can get the votes, while in reality, the stuff these mean is completely different. And it is not just the “traditional values” - history also plays a part in this.
In my country, the AUR party makes heavy use of medieval rulers like Vlad the Impaler (yes, that one that is known in the Western pop culture as count Dracula) to stirr nostalgia for a past most people don’t know. Or their Facebook pages post lots of ex-communist propaganda (messages like “before 1989 we were masters on our own lands, now we’re slaves to the foreigners” or “we had an industry back then, we had factories, we were producing our own stuff, now we sold everything and we no longer have shit” etc.).
They are basically romanticising the past in order to get to power, and maybe blur the line between the democratic institutions afterward - just like in Russia, but also in Hungary or even Poland.
removed by mod
I know this whole thing is tiring and frustrating. I just explained how things look like in this side of the world, where in the current young(er) democratic regimes people are still nostalgic over the older despotic regimes where the economy was flourishing (spoiler: it was not) and basic human rights were systematically violated by the state.
I respect your opinion, and if there are any elections where you live, I urge you to go out and vote for the best option you may find. Be on the lookout for what every political force is saying/doing, corroborate all the information as good as you can, compare them, and choose the person you find less likely to turn your country into something like I described above.
Democracy is, after all, the power of the people, and if any politician/party is threatening to take away this power - or even erode it - then that one is not fit for any seat that is running for.
I live in Russia, so meaningful elections are off the menu for a period of time.
The fact that a mod decided that my comment should be removed is telling. See, if we consider that only freaks openly funded by Russia yadda yadda are its hands in Europe, then what I said is harmful, because I’m spreading the attention of the reader to wide. But if what I said is true and European politics are in general, just as well in the West, penetrated by Russian\Azeri\etc influence, with bribing politicians and companies which then lobby for criminal regimes, then what that mod did is much more harmful.
