• Y|yukichigai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        If you like it you should check out Guy Ritchie’s previous film, 2005’s Revolver. It’s a little more “experimental” I’d say, but some of the film’s choices are really cool, especially how it depicts how some characters remember and interpret events differently than others.

    • @Baccata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      I mean, even though they’re not explicitly connected, Guy Ritchie has made a number of movies with similar tone/vibe and London Crime setting. I’m choosing to believe they’re happening in the same universe

      • Lock, Stock and a smoking barrel
      • Snatch
      • Revolver
      • The gentlemen (which was also derived as a decent Netflix show)

      There’s also Layer Cake from Matthew Vaughn which scratches the same itch.

  • @graham1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    468 months ago

    The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. It did quite well when it came out, and it felt like there was potential for sequels

    • @Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      268 months ago

      I’m surprised nobody has done a modern TV version. All five books have been successfully adapted for radio, the scripts are done, it’s already blocked out into well-paced individual episodes. It’s just sitting there waiting to be made. You just need a good cast and a show runner who isn’t going to monkey with the source material. It’s already proven to be popular and long-lived. Seems like a no-brainer.

      • @DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 months ago

        All five books have been successfully adapted for radio

        As far as I’m aware, the first two radio series predate the books. So, in fact, they were successfully adapted into print.

        • @angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          Which I didn’t like at all, it felt too much like an audiobook to me, reading all the guide bits, not like an adaptation. Looks like you can never satisfy all fans at once.

      • AwesomeLowlander
        link
        fedilink
        68 months ago

        show runner who isn’t going to monkey with the source material

        When’s the last time THAT happened?

    • @turddle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      88 months ago

      Ohh that’s a good one. The other books afterwards were great too.

      Would’ve loved a sequel and would honestly not mind them artistically fudging it a bit to pick back up with an older Arthur Dent

        • @BigPotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          I believe Adams himself considered each different medium to be “it’s own story” though just as he added and changed things from the radio play for the book, he also added and changed things in the movie screen play… When he was involved in it. I’m not going to pretend it was all his work but it was it’s own thing.

        • @BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          48 months ago

          Douglas Adams writing doesn’t translate well to film I think, a bit like Pratchett’s. It can be done (Good Omens was a great adaptation of Pratchett) but it’s probably super hard to do well and keep the original feeling/spirit

          • Rob T Firefly
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The 1981 TV series did a fine job, likely in no small part thanks to having Adams himself around and involved.

            I feel like any future HHG adaptation would need to be TV rather than theatrical film. That universe is just too full to condense meaningfully into a 90-minute blockbuster meant to keep the Hollywood lowest common denominator in their seats. You need room for all the multilayered apparently-random stuff interacting with each other in the particularly bizarre ways Adams was so good at pulling off, and it needs to capture the whimsy of the source material without devolving into the unremarkable formulaic stuff the latest attempt to do Dirk Gently on TV turned out to be.

        • @Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          98 months ago

          And the book wasn’t living up to the original radio series

          Mostly kidding on that

          I agree that I like the book better, initially I disliked the movie, but I’ve come around on it, some things from the radio series were changed for the book, and so it just kind of feels right they’d further change things for the movie. Playing a little fast and loose with it feels very in the Douglass Adams spirit to me.

    • Björn Tantau
      link
      fedilink
      128 months ago

      I blame Douglas Adams’ extended tax evasion scheme. I think they were already struggling to finish the first one.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      108 months ago

      I remember reading that they were trying to get District 10 done?

      • @roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        Yeah, but before the director made several more movies that were all bad. I don’t know how he keeps getting work.

          • @herrvogel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            His stuff at least manages to make money somehow, so that makes some kind of sense from a money worship point of view. I doubt Blomkamp’s movies raked in as much cash though.

          • @BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            I mean, stupid teenage boys will spend what money they have to hang out with their friends… So, it’s a viable audience.

          • @roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            68 months ago

            Yeah, that’s another that makes no sense to me. People largely dislike all his recent works. “Let’s give him a huge budget for a two part star wars fan fic!”

            • @MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Snyder has an amazing eye for action. Sucker Punch, 300, and Watchmen were all amazing visual/auditory feasts. Everything else about his movies is just average to below average, though.

              Giving him a Star Wars makes perfect sense when you consider what Disney thinks of the Star Wars audience. “Just give them laser sword and space ships and explosions and they’ll be happy.”

                • @roofuskit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  18 months ago

                  Blokamp is great at effects and story ideas, he’s not a good director. Even District 9 is a bit of a directorial mess but there’s enough interesting story there to overcome that. The rest of his films? Not so much.

                • @MagicShel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  18 months ago

                  I personally wouldn’t put him above Snyder in the visuals category, but I respect your opinion and I don’t think you’re way off or anything. I can see having that preference.

    • astrsk
      link
      fedilink
      328 months ago

      I might be in the minority but Chappie was a really good movie. It’s a real bummer Die Antword were so horrible to work with that the director kinda gave up on it.

    • There were plans, with the daughter joining the family business.

      FUBAR on Netflix isn’t terrible since it plays some of the same keys as True Lies, and it got renewed for a second season…but it’s painfully obvious that Arnold is too old for this stuff anymore.

      They tried a TV reboot adaptation of True Lies. It was baaad

    • @Eldbogi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      I once read that they planned on a sequel but then the terrorist attacks on the world trade center happened so they cancelled it.

      Something about not wanting to make fun of terrorism anymore.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    168 months ago

    For a long time, I would have said Unbreakable. I’m glad that he ended up continuing the story, eventually.

    • EleventhHour
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s referred to as the Eastrail 177 Trilogy now

      I like them, too

    • MaggiWuerze
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      I never knew it was supposed to be a series until they announced Split

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        Me neither. Actually, I didn’t realize Split was in the same “universe” until the very end, when David was watching the news on TV. That was an awesome surprise!

    • @poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 months ago

      The title for the sequel could be some kind of pun on how the film is faster and/or more furious than what would be reasonable under normal circumstances

  • @nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    188 months ago

    The Road to El Dorado was the pilot for an animated series that never got greenlit. Massive missed opportunity, I would love to see “the continuing adventures of three latin rogues and a horse”

    • @COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      At the time animated series didn’t have the same quality they do today, I suspect it’s reputation is so good because there’s no subsequent animated series.

  • @Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Kung Pow: Enter the Fist

    They even teased it man… Pretty sure every kid has an existential crisis when they searched for that sequel in Google and found out it didn’t exist.