• @Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Spamming as a conservative on multiple posts? This is the same type of posts you see on conservative reddit, always pointing out both sides, when there’s almost none of the same type of opinionated posts when referring to Republicans. I know you like to blame Dems, but Republicans are the ones actually promoting and using racism , and fascism right? Where’s the criticism against them with such vigor as your post. Your the reason why Reddit has been so aggressive with their banning. Also because your barely mention Rs in good faith. Yes dema has their problems, but Republicans are far worst people.

  • @MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Looook,

    We are ALL going to Hell, FAST (choose your doom(CC,WWIII,etc).

    We are all in the same car, here -like it, or not.

    One party, …I’ll let you guess which 😉, has the accelerator pinned to the mat. “We’ll be there in 5 minutes, Boys!! HELL ON EARTH HERE WE COME!”

    The other party, is simply driving at half that speed. Results are the same. They are flawed. But they CAN slow the car to give us a bit more time to “brace for impact”. But they too bought into Hell as a destination.

    But ya, we’re ALL fucked no matter how much you pledge to one party or the other. One party just whispers in your ear and it’s a bit more gentle while they fuck your already ragged ass.

    The other party just dry-humps you violently until your blood provides enough lube for them to finish while pounding their chest as you lie there, bleeding out of your ass on the nice, clean sheets.

    That about sums it up from my perspective.

    • @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      The problem with this is that it assumes both parties act independently.

      You know how right now how Republicans are willing to use every loophole, cite ancient forgotten laws, and violate every norm? That’s always been possible. You can’t actually write a constitution to constrain bad-faith actors. You can always come up with a bogus interpretation to do what you want.

      If this is possible, you have to ask, why did leaders ever try to follow the law in good faith? How was it ever possible to establish a norms-based stability when either side could knock over the board at any moment?

      The answer is that good-faith interpretation of the law fails when people only do so out of principle. It succeeds when good-faith interpretation is a peace treaty. Both sides agree to follow the law in good faith, as the alternative is complete chaos as both sides try to twist every loophole.

      Democrats are a bunch of liberal arts majors that have forgotten that Democracy and the rule of law does not exist because everyone worships them as high ideals. They exist because they are a compromise, a peace treaty.

      Republicans break norms. In response, Dems latch on even tighter to the norms. Instead, they should be seeking to break them at every opportunity they can. They need to be as ruthless as the Republicans, and even more so.

      Following the rule of law is hard. It means giving up power and results that you could otherwise achieve by violating the rule of law.

      Right now, only Democrats are trying to obey every norm and precedent. As such, Republicans have nothing to lose by violating these. It’s all upside to them. Their bad behavior is the direct result of Democratic cowardice. If Democrats were willing to give as well as they get, we could actually have a rules-based order again. Paradoxically, a prerequisite for rules to be effective is that both sides need to be willing to violate them.

      • Miles O'Brien
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        As I like to say, “The moral high road is filled with corpses”

      • Well said!

        In short, fire with fire. …can’t fight a war with one hand tied to your balls, etc.

        Dems have forgotten this. They need a leader to remind them and lead the charge.

    • @eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      if someone told you that, that’s what their sex life was like; you would assume that they’re a damaged person who needs psychiatric help and those psychiatrist would try to help steer them away from sex partners like that and towards healthier sex partners.

      even our neighbors to the south have learned this fact and made their own sex lives better; but we americans are like battered spouses who keep bouncing back and forth between the same 2 abusive lovers because we both refuse to accept how damaged we truly are and because the more damaged among us keep re-inforcing the propaganda that voting democrat or republican is the only “grown up” choice to make as the “adults in the room”.

      we’re only destined for hell if we keep rejecting a third party; places like mexico have already proved that things get A LOT better once you stop carrying the propaganda that third party is “throwing away” your vote.

      (or atleast until you get the america’s attention and they send in their military and bankers to force you back into those abusive relationships… again).

  • @VeldtSchema@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    31 month ago

    I think this is a fair POV. No one is perfect. Thinking that you cannot criticise something you are part of, you like, or are somehow related to, is just childish.

  • @Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 month ago

    Nah. Both parties suck. Repubs damage, Dems half ass do damage control, then sit around making minor changes and act like they’re saviors. The geriatric fucks that hold seats have no semblance of understanding the current world and so we fall behind the curve further every year. Easy things that are obvious never get passed because those get bribed. Sick of the whole system obviously.

    • @geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      281 month ago

      Republicans are the problem. Democrats are pretending to be the solution but are also the problem.

      The reason Democrats deserve more hate is because they divert people from organising a solution to the problem. At least Republicans are honest about how much they suck.

    • @Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      251 month ago

      Democrats don’t do damage control, they actively build the machinery for the next republican to be even more brutal.

      • @underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They got so heated about pro Palestinian stuff on TikTok that they handed Donald Trump authority to ban any website he feels like by executive fiat. Then TikTok didn’t get banned and Trump got for credit for saving it.

  • @ofcourse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    111 month ago

    It’s been 8 years of the lesser evil with Democrats and I’m sick of them. I cannot in good conscience support them any longer because they have time and again chosen to maintain the status quo.

    The Biden administration did many things to help Americans, most notably the Inflation Reduction Act and the student debt forgiveness. But most of it is being dismantled by the current administration. And the Dems knew this would be the case. Yet they chose to go the executive order route or the highly diluted down IRA. It’s not the people’s problem that you cannot get your party members in line. Why would we vote for you if you cannot deliver?

    Nancy Pelosi chose not to even allow the bill to prevent members of Congress from insider trading. Republicans are using it to line their pockets like never before. You want to have your cake and eat it too. Well the people are sick of your hypocrisy and it showed in the elections.

    It’s been more than a month of rapid fire gutting of the US government. What has the party done as the main opposition besides “coming up with a strategy”? Because it’s impossible to do anything meaningful without revealing how much you have gained from the system.

    The Democrats who truly care about change need to spin off their own party. That’s the only way enough people will be mobilized to make a meaningful difference in the next elections.

  • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    61 month ago

    The demos current lack of action against the monkey business going on now is s loudass tell about how sympathetic they are

  • @surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    621 month ago

    You would think committing a genocide would’ve settled the whole “lesser evil” thing, but the Blue MAGA cult insists there’s a way to commit lesser evil genocide now.

    • @DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -9
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I mean how dumb do you have to be to think genocide is equivalent in all scenarios?

      One party’s leaders at least openly expressed their discontent with Israel and floated stopping arms shipments. And that party’s voters had a significant movement to express their discontent as well. The other party’s God-King literally said Israel should finish the job and is now posting on social media that he wants to level Gaza, ship Palestinians to other countries, and turn Gaza into a fucking vacation resort, and his voters are all about it.

      Get the fuck out of here with your false equivalency.

      • @surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        381 month ago

        The problem with people with like you is you listen to what the Dems say they’re doing, and don’t bother to confirm what Dems are actually doing. It’s why you’re all terrified of Trump’s immigration policies, and have no clue that Obama & Biden deported way more people.

        You’re in a cult.

        • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -231 month ago

          Does the way in which they are deported matter?

          Is it better when they target people who are undocumented and provably so vs just checking out everyone tanner than a Mainer in the winter?

          Do you see a difference between the specific policies of the two administrations?

          • @underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            281 month ago

            Youre going to keep doing this lesser evil bit until the dems have you seig heiling while the republicans drain your blood for the ritual to begin Armageddon.

            • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -171 month ago

              No, I think the administrators on top are switched and they give different marching orders. They enforce policy differently based on who is in the Oval office and that administration’s decisions. That is why there is a difference in how these deportations were carried out.

              Do you think the top agents determine policy for an agency?

              • @surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                241 month ago

                This is why no one takes Dem voters seriously. Y’all believe the press releases matter more than the material actions.

                • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -141 month ago

                  My whole point is the material actions of the two administrations do differ. Trump is targeting anyone not white whereas Biden at least targeted people with legal violations. One policy puts all immigrants in fear while the other theoretically should not.

                  The fact that you can’t see the difference isn’t something I can help you with.

                • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -16
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Oh and the only voters that aren’t taken seriously in the ISA are leftists and if you doubt that for a second please point out the progressive party that controls anything in this shithole.

  • @AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    521 month ago

    Obama and Biden said they’d legalize weed. They didn’t. They failed to put abortion rights into the constitution. I mean I can go on these are just off the top of my head.

    They are not immune to legit criticism, however it seems like people get the idea that if you criticize democrats that means you are a die hard Trumper or something…

    • Franklin
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      I mean didn’t Trump also promise that and not deliver

      • @UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 month ago

        Probably because two political parties isn’t enough to truly represent the population.

        People shit talk non voters, but these are people who found no representation in the two party system. We can change this. We can have more then two political parties. To think otherwise is to think inside the world’s smallest box.

        • @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Duverger’s Law says that as long as we have this system of voting, we’re going to have two, and only two, major parties. It has changed once in history: when the Republicans replaced the Whigs. So, that’s what you’re looking at: either change the system of voting or replace one of the two parties.

          • @Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The major political parties may have only changed names once, but the most common stance in modern political science is that we are in the 6th political party alignment in US history.

            • Centralization 1796-1824
            • Jacksonians 1828-1852
            • Republicans 1856-1892
            • Progressives 1898-1928
            • New Dealers 1932-1972
            • Neoliberalism 1980-Present
        • @AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Countries with more parties such as those in Western Europe are also electing fascists. The answer doesn’t lie in more parties. China has a majority party and it doesn’t get people doing the Sieg Heil

    • @underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      36
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Didn’t close gitmo. Didn’t end the war on terror. Created the same border camps democrats cry at the gates of for political points. Bailed out the perpetrators of one of this countries most high profile and damaging financial crimes because they held rich peoples stock portfolios hostage. Made pointless concessions on the ACA to republicans who never once cross the isle for even the things they want to pass because they’d rather take the credit themselves.

      Those are the ones I’m pulling off the top of my head.

    • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Back up. Put abortion rights in the constitution? I cant take you seriously.

      Edit: 9 people are ignorant and need a civics lesson. Constitutional amendments were. never. on. the. table.

  • @vfreire85@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    41 month ago

    well said. you can pretty much extrapolate this line of thought to every soc-dem, left-of-center, liberal party in the world. they make a wiener water government, blame people when they lose elections and are left wondering why people didn’t called their wiener water government a bouillabasse or an onion soup.

  • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    321 month ago

    Running a feckless campaign that refused to break with Biden’s admin on genocide is why we got this living hell. And running the most unlikeable woman in the country in 2016 is what made 2024 even a possibility.

    Dems have fucked up terribly.

    • @vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      That about sums it up.

      I’ll vote Democrat as long as the alternative is fascism.

      But fuck me, I’d love to vote for something else. And I’ll be honest, I have no idea how we get anything better.

      I hear people saying to organize, but I can’t even imagine what that takes. I wonder if most Americans feel as helpless as I do in the face of this absolute bullshit.

      • @dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        The hard fact is that what the population votes for is what the population gets. They have completely given up their agency and just accept this impotent logic of “we’ll take whatever the most obvious/most apparently easy option is, that isn’t a Republican”. It’s a cyclical problem, the voters don’t care enough to force politicians to be good, and the politicians don’t care enough to court voters.

        • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          The hard fact is that what the population votes for is what the population gets.

          It really isn’t, study after study has shown that popularity has basically no effect on policy.

          • @dx1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            …the candidate the population votes for. Did you need that to say “who”?

        • @vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          61 month ago

          At the same time, “what the population votes for is what the population gets” ignores that we are often only presented with crappy options to start with.

          Perhaps it would be more accurate to say “you get what you fight for, and if you don’t fight you get what you get.”

          I… haven’t really fought for anything. I believed the right things. I voted as best I could. But that clearly didn’t stop this.

          I want to protect my ego and say I’m not a coward. Is there a distinction to be made between cowardice and simply not knowing what to do? I don’t know. I just know I’m trying my best, but maybe that’s just not enough.

          • @dx1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            At the same time, “what the population votes for is what the population gets” ignores that we are often only presented with crappy options to start with.

            It does not ignore that, rather it explicitly takes that into account.

            The caveat to my statement would ONLY be “so long as we’re using this system.”

            Please focus more on accurate logic.

      • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 month ago

        I’ll vote Democrat as long as the alternative is fascism.

        Unfortunately, much of what the Democrats represent is fascism.

        • @vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          -21 month ago

          Depends on what you mean by “much”? I’d argue the Democrats, on the whole, are liberals, not fascists.

          I’d certainly prefer progressives and leftists though.

          The support for Israel whole they genocide Palestine, thought… ugh. That can certainly be viewed as fascism, although where you draw the distinction between fascism and imperialism is up for debate. Not that imperialism is good either, just saying.

          • @yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 month ago

            Liberals are the only people in history to vote for fascists to prevent class solidarity, and they’ve done it every time.

            If you scratch a liberal, a fascist bleeds.

              • @yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 month ago

                Conservative liberals have the same ideology as liberals, just the pace is different. American politics have fucked too many people’s brains.

                • @vonbaronhans@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -61 month ago

                  Yeah, I don’t buy that. Liberalism and Conservatism have different ideological foundations, philosophical traditions, and political histories.

                  If you don’t know the difference, that’s on you.

                  I have to make a lot of leaps to guess what you mean by “conservative liberal”. Do you mean a modern “social liberal economic conservative”? Aka a neoliberal?

                  Cuz yeah US Dems and Repubs are almost all economically neoliberal, sure. Is that what you mean?